Ready Player One

Ready Player One

 After finishing Ready Player One, I must admit I really liked the book, way more than I expected to be honest. It made my geeky side quite happy and constantly bugged my anxiety and curiosity as I read through it. Now, taking on the book though an ethical point of view, I want to start by analyzing the following quotes:

Morrow wrote in his autobiography that he’d left GSS because ... he felt that the OASIS had evolved into something horrible. “It had become a self-imposed prison for humanity,” he wrote. “A pleasant place for the world to hide from its problems while human civilization slowly collapses, primarily due to neglect.” (p. 120) 


(Halliday speaking) “I created the OASIS because I never felt at home in the real world. I didn’t know how to connect with people there. I was afraid, for all of my life. Right up until I knew it was ending. That was when I realized, as terrifying and painful as reality can be, it’s also the only place where you can find true happiness. Because reality is real.” (p. 364)


I agree with the main idea behind both quotes. Today we can already see how social media have strongly impacted society. It is not rare to see people that pay way more attention today to their social image in the web through sites like Instagram or Facebook, and are more likely to do whatever it takes to get more followers and "likes", to fill up their self esteem and pride, rather than focusing on themselves and truely do something with their lives. With the great increase of technology these days, it has become so easy to evade reality and our problems through the cellphone or the computer, and it is worrying and sad. It reminds me of this episode of Black Mirror called Nosedive, you should watch it in Netflix.

Having a system like OASIS in real life, that is kinda difficult to imagine nowadays. Even though the whole industry is slowly aiming towards the development of AI, machine learning, and the IoT, I do think we are still far from developing a system as complex and inclusive as OASIS. However, I would not dare to say it ain't possible in some 50 years from now, I mean, anything can happen in the future.

What I do believe, however, is that we are not ready as a species to deal with such technology. And I'm not talking about physically, emotionally or psychologically. I refer to a level of maturity as society and species. Yes, it would be awesome and it would have its virtues, as it would become the massive, ultimate datacenter of every knowledge harvested by the human race, and (if successfully developed) would encourage even more globalization and the mixing of cultures worldwide. But as long as we don't learn to control technology and ourselves, it will be technology itself what will dictate the future of the human race, as we will begin to adapt to it instead of it adapting to us, due to its increasing complexity.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

War Games

War Games War Games is a sci-fi movie from 1983 that narrates the story of David Lightman, a teenager that trying to hack into what he thought was a videogame development company accessed instead into a top secret military base computer and initialized a "game" called Global Thermonuclear War, which ran a simulation of a nuclear war between the USSR and the USA, driving everybody mad as they thought the simulation was a real deal, and giving a head start to a potential World War 3. Even though it is considered a classic, I must admit I had never seen the movie, not even heard about it. I watched it without knowing a thing about the plot, and I enjoyed it more than I expected to be honest. However there are a lot of things that I found a little absurd and highly unlikely to occur in real life. The plot itself, for instance. Just to think that a kid by accident has the ability to enter a military base is something I found too fictional to my taste, even when we are talking...
Read more

Software Architecture

The power of good software architecture The importance behind a simple, yet efficient design. In the chapter 14 of his book "Code Craft", author and developer Peter GoodLiffe talks about the importance and influence of good software designing. I found it quite practical (and a little unconventional) how he describes the different styles of architecture in software through comparisons with pasta. I was so hungry yet intrigued while reading through the descriptions of each type and the different applications each have for different situations. I always find it overwhelming how easy it can seem to make a good base to develop software, and yet there are so many sources and lectures on how to get it right, as it is clearly underestimated how challenging it can result to make not only a functional software, but flexible, modular, esthetic, and reliable. And the most difficult thing of all is that there are NO right answers. There are NO instructions or guides on how to b...
Read more

Understanding the SOLID Principles

Understanding the SOLID Principles In a section on the book “Ace the Programming Interview: 160 Questions and Answers for Success”, Edward Guiness talks about a set of practices to have simple and efficient code: The SOLID Principles. The acronym stands for:  Single Responsibility Principle Open/Closed Principle Liskov Substitution Principle Interface Segregation Principle Dependency Inversion Principle The Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) states that each class should have one and exactly one responsibility. Only experience and practice will help you determine what one responsibility envolves, The Open/Closed Principle (OCP) says that each class should be open for extension, but closed for modification. When adding new behavior, we should leave the base class alone and instead create new inheriting classes, and avoid unexpected consequences for the original subclasses. The Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP) says that the less inheritance we h...
Read more